Policeman Essay

When we see the natural righteousness in our neighborhoods, we are secured in the knowledge that we are in safe hands. The police evoke a sense of beingness safe when they are around knowing that they have the capacity to enforce the law and keep criminal elements at bay. We can take our children to the park and watch them p land, secure in the aim of neighborhood beat police patrolling the streets. It is a safe place with the police around. But are they eer welcome? Ever since the fall of the other world force, the Soviet Union, the joined States has been the sole keeper of that ennoble (Weiner).Historians predicted that soon, democracy and freedom lead be the norm around the world (Weiner). But some record that the coupled States has been remiss in its duties as the global law enforcer (Weiner). Thus, the question is posed, should the world enquire the unify States to start policing the global neighborhood (Weiner)? The question better posed would be is, can the unify States be capable of being the policeman (Utley)? Many Neo-conservatives in the Republican party give a glimpse of the infirmities that are inherent to the desire of some to see the United States patrolling the worlds hotspots (Utley).The United States, being the only legitimate superpower left, is incapable of launching any sort of campaign that will make it an empire, or at least, make a significant impact in enforcing the law in other parts of the world (Utley). This is the argument of right-wing isolationists being criticized by the left-wing of the party in dissuading the United States from making an attempt in launching an imperialist waver (Utley). For any imperialist wave to succeed, the power in government must be one that has a strong centralist orientation, as was the case of Great Britain and the old Roman empire (Utley).In Britains case, the center of that power lay in the hand of some of the elites in the society, give or take a few votes from the humans (Utley). Th is elite mainly consisted of those who owned tracts of land and a fraction of the population (Utley). In Rome, the Roman Senate set foreign policy in the state (Utley). But in the case of the United States, the practice is kinda the opposite. The Constitution is very clear in the tenet of preservation of freedom, non curtailing it (Utley).This fundamental framework of the prservation of freedom is enshrined in the Bill of Rights of the Constitution (Utley). In the American scheme of things, the strength of the political structure is not in concentration, but in dispersal of that power (Utley). This is done to curtail any initiative in undertaking foreign military adventurism (Utley). The history of the United States foreign policy manoeuverings has also been riddled with being inclined to serve the interests of certain sectors, especially businesses (Utley).There were times that Big Business was the preeminent mover in determining American foreign policy (Utley). This premise ha s given way to local impel organizations and television coverage of foreign incidents (Utley). In understanding the central role of television, it must be construed that televsison selects the defiant sitting duck (Utley). As the news groups broadcast, this is picked up by the authorities, causing a stir of American support and good will to be poured egress on the place or region (Utley). Unfortunately, this fervour of support will very much cause more hardship and havoc (Utley).It is here that the United States, finding things in disarray, tends to reach out and aids the country or region find a glossary of balance (Utley). Examples are not hard to find for the case at hand. In the U. S. -led invasion of capital of Kuwait to liberate the country from the Iraqi invaders, a story, untrue and unverrfied, ran about 20 Kuwaiti babies being hurled out of their incubators by the Iraqi raiders (Utley). This happened before the war (Utley). The story generated a groundswell of indign ation and spurred the United States to move in with their military might (Utley).The end result of this carnage was far from the desired outcome. At the onset of the conflict, the United States decimated vital installations in the course of its military intervention (Utley). This left utilities in shambles sanititation, electrical contemporaries and food producing facilities were completely destroyed, leaving half a million children dead in its wake (Utley). The censor on imports on even chlorine and materials for rebuilding the nation left it with unsafe drinking piss (Utley). To follow the mindset of the generals, they are not schooled in the consideration of the consequences of their actions.All they want is how to quash the adversary and win the war (Utley). Haiti would be another prime piece of evidence on the failure of American interventionist policy. Before entering into its war games mentality, the United States first reduced the nations, and peoples, means of sustainm ent by slapping an economic interdiction against the island nation (Utley). Then when the war mongers in the Federal government did not see the embargo working towards the desired goal, it went ahead and invaded the nation (Utley).As a result of the American military intervention, the people of Haiti are now in a far worse lot than they began with (Utley). Now, quite of becoming economically stable, the people of Haiti are now more dependent on imports from the United States (Utley). The number of American police strategy is sometimes is quite disturbing. When the American televison industry wearies of one subject, more often than not the American government forgets about it too (Utley). Simply put, it justs walks from the subject, leaving their posts when its no longer news, as in the cases of Haiti, Somalia or Panama (Utley).Or it just goes about imposing blockades to leave the people in hardship,like what is happening now in Iraq and Serbia (Utley). This practice of some God-g iven mission is not the lone and sole office of the United States, nor did it start with them. The concept was derived from the Divine Right of Kings practised in England (Neoperspectives). This was the practice in umteen European monarchies at the time of the founding of the United States (Neoperspectives). The King could just wave his hand or snap his fingers together and someone could lose his life (Neoperspectives).The United States World Police? So the actions of the United States leaves us with the question, should the United States take up the cudgels for policing the world, or, was there an offer in the first place? or so would point to the administration of former U. S. President Bill Clinton for the dilemma that the United States is facing (RateItAll). As the earlier statement mentioned, the fall of the Soviet Union left the United States as the only legitimate superpower on the planet (Weiner).But again the question is raised, did the world ask for it? The question is somewhat answered by formere Secretary of State Madeleine Albright to Colin Powell (RateItAll). Albright avers that since they have one of the strongest fighting forces at their disposal, then why not give them (RateItAll)? Was the thinking of Albright correct? According to University of Texas profeesor and author Robert Jensen, its not. The United States is not acting at all as the world police instead it is bullying the world into submission (Jensen).