Negligence Manslaughter Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Negligence Manslaughter - Essay ExampleThe researcher states that murder is an ideal example of a case under shepherds crook law as it is a crime that affects the interest of the public. The laws ensure that there is equality among individuals and the public in general. It prevents the public from negligence, thus facilitating responsibility. Criminal law is typical for uniquely honorable potential sanctions and consequences for failure to respect its provisions and rules. All crimes have criminal elements, that the difference comes in when one evaluate the order of each crime. An ideal example is capital punishment, which entail the jurisdiction of the most serious crimes. Some criminal offences lead to corporal punishment, and the resultant punishment is welt or caning. However, many nations discourage such punishments and have made them illegal as a result of irresponsible use of the punishment. This is a crime that is spend a penny and is, therefore, not considered a murde r of less degree. There is a vast difference between murder and manslaughter. In murder, there must be the nominal head of malice while not present in a manslaughter case. Murder can be seen as a more serious case than Manslaughter, save it is not an excusable or justifiable cleanup spot to which punishment should be imposed. Under the common law and withal current statutes, the case in suspicion is either involuntary or voluntary manslaughter. The difference between this two is that, in voluntary manslaughter, there must be some serious dead body harm and also an intention to kill. While, in the case of involuntary manslaughter, these cases are not present. ... This was against the provisions of the constitution, in reference to public health (Gorr And Sterling 1999). It also a crime to neglect medical services of a result of the fear of the unknown this means that it is an obligation to report to any public hospital in case of ailments. After evaluation of this case, it is a greeable that, it is a case under manslaughter. This is because Paul had no intensions to kill but ended up killing his wife. However, it is under negligence manslaughter where the defendant fails to touch to a singularly serious duty leading to death of another. In this condition, Paul did not fail to attend to his duty because of commitments, as that would be a defense raise on against his judgment it was all as a result of fear of losing the child because of financial instability. From the scenario, it is evident that Paul has two cases to answer. The first case is going against the provisions of the Public health act, while the other is negligence manslaughter (Harwood, 2000). Manslaughter This is a crime that is lighten and is, therefore, not considered a murder of less degree. There is a vast difference between murder and manslaughter. In murder, there must be the front of malice while not present in a manslaughter case. Murder can be seen as a more serious case than Mansl aughter, but it is not an excusable or justifiable killing to which punishment should be imposed (Fletcher, 1998). Under the common law and also current statutes, the case in question is either involuntary or voluntary manslaughter. The difference between this two is that, in voluntary manslaughter, there must be some serious body harm and also an intention to kill. While, in the case of involuntary manslaughter, these cases are not present. Murderer has